From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1LvG86-0002zr-GJ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:23:10 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvG83-0002zA-Gr for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:23:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvG7y-0002wX-Ux for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:23:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33132 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LvG7y-0002wU-OU for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:23:02 -0400 Received: from arnold.marlboro.edu ([206.192.68.78]:43641) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvG7y-00039L-ET for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:23:02 -0400 Received: from akbar.marlboro.edu (akbar.marlboro.edu [10.1.2.5]) by arnold.marlboro.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFCB178061; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:22:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xyz.marlboro.edu (xyz.marlboro.edu [10.1.2.29]) by akbar.marlboro.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B6411E55D; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:22:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from east.localnet (mdhcp105.marlboro.edu [10.1.4.105]) by xyz.marlboro.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC53B3AC444; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:22:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Isaac Dupree To: grub-devel@gnu.org Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:22:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.4 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.1.4; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904181522.14097.ml@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> X-Marlboro-MailScanner-Information: Please contact techsupport@marlboro.edu for more information X-Marlboro-MailScanner: Found to be clean, clean X-Marlboro-Information: Please contact techsupport@marlboro.edu for more information X-Marlboro-MailScanner-ID: 9DFCB178061.E13A2 X-Marlboro-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Marlboro-MailScanner-From: ml@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org X-Marlboro-MailScanner-Watermark: 1240687341.42351@Mhw7Mv6OVO60hvPtAByNJg X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Cc: Vladimir Serbinenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] bless command X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:23:07 -0000 Vladimir Serbinenko wrote: > Syntax: > hfspbless > It works only on HFS+ volumes. Could it be named 'hfsplusbless' (or possibly 'hfs+bless') (I guess our current naming style involves no underscores or other word-separation)? For example, Linux `mount` calls the filesystem `hfsplus`, and I like naming- consistency. But feel free to mention counterexamples too! -Isaac