From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] Add NMI injection support to SVM.
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:41:43 +0300
Message-ID: <20090419134143.GM10126@redhat.com>
References: <1239616545-25199-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1239616545-25199-14-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <49E8DEC1.4030802@web.de> <20090419131735.GG10126@redhat.com> <49EB26BA.9020200@web.de> <20090419133222.GK10126@redhat.com> <49EB29E3.5030901@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	joerg.roedel@amd.com, sheng@linux.intel.com,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43499 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1761071AbZDSNlr (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:41:47 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49EB29E3.5030901@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 04:40:51PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> It's OK as a first step towards correct NMI emulation. Additionally, you
>>> could enable the IRQ window interception in case the is an NMI pending.
>>> The resulting behavior should then much like the VNMI mask emulation for
>>> vmx.
>>>
>>>     
>> Yeah, but the question is if IRQ windows is already opened will exit
>> happens before or after IRET.
>>   
>
> You mean if the NMI handler enabled interrupts?
>
Yes.

--
			Gleb.