From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756997AbZDVKlX (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:41:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754400AbZDVKlN (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:41:13 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:39455 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752239AbZDVKlN (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:41:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:41:01 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Zhaolei , Tom Zanussi , Li Zefan , KOSAKI Motohiro , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] tracing/events: provide string with undefined size support Message-ID: <20090422104101.GF1115@elte.hu> References: <1240117295-6873-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1240117295-6873-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20090421221241.GA6744@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Thanks! > > Then, may be I should wait for Ingo's pull (if he accepts) > > before sending a delta to add the parenthesis around __get_str(). > > It would probably be better to just make the fix now. Just put the > fix in a separate branch to avoid race conditions (if Ingo already > did a pull ;-) Yeah - doing a -v2 (-v3, -v4 ;-) COW branch and then removing them once they served their purpose does the trick here. While i generally dont get surprised (negatively ;) by seeing more (or less) stuff in a branch than expected from the pull request (i review it all anyway), it's good to practice the COW pull workflow so that if you send stuff to Linus or others who expect COW there's no mistakes. Ingo