From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [206.46.173.19] (helo=vms173019pub.verizon.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LxGeu-00080R-Pk for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:21:21 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([71.255.242.201]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KIL00LJ4IZN3VZ7@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:16:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0EB36B83A8; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:16:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:16:34 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20090424081634.GE28636@denix.org> References: <1240558083-13432-1-git-send-email-k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> <20090424073122.GA28636@denix.org> <2DE2BF31-0CEB-4FC0-9180-2AF38BDD8861@student.utwente.nl> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <2DE2BF31-0CEB-4FC0-9180-2AF38BDD8861@student.utwente.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: [STABLE][PATCH] udev 124: add cache invalidation logic on kernel change or its bootargs/cmdline/atags X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:21:26 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:47:17AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 24 apr 2009, om 09:31 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven: > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> From: Denys Dmytriyenko >>> >>> also add /etc/default/udev with the option to disable device caching >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko >>> Acked-by: Tom Rini >>> Acked-by: Koen Kooi >>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi >> >> Can/should I ack my own patch? :) > > I was wondering about the same, since 3 stable maintainers already approved > the patch going into .dev. Do you want to push this into stable? Sure, I can push it. BTW, I just sent to the list another udev patch to be considered for stable (fix .so link for SDK) - if approved, I'd like to push that patch before this one, in the same order as in .dev... -- Denys