From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Mack Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:47:55 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] Toradex board with Colibri PXA270 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428104755.GA23563@buzzloop.caiaq.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:37:14AM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > I'm currently working with a Toradex board featuring a Colibri PXA270 module, > and I noticed this attempt to get a Colibri PXA270 patch applied > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050634.html > > ... which seems it didn't get anywhere further than so. > > The conclusion, or should I say request, from there was to make more parts > re-used within the source tree to reduce code duplication and I can only agree > with that. > > Seeing that this is a PXA(270) equipped board, wouldn't it make sense to do > some of the low level init etc stuff in the cpu-specific area (cpu/pxa/) ? The > entire gpio handling (and similar) is after all common for all PXA270 isn't > it? > > So, is there anyone with more specific thoughts or opinions on this? What can > I do to push this forward to the next level? In case you do that, please call the board 'colibri-pxa270' in folder and config file names, not just 'colibri' like in the version you referred to above. There are versions of that modules with pxa3[012]0 CPUs which are entirely different and need extra care. I submitted a patch to support that module 1,5 years ago - if you miss some pieces, you might have a look here: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2007-November/026890.html Bringing this in shape is a good idea, though. Daniel