From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>,
Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>,
Paul Shen <bshen9@marvell.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] pxa: clean up the legacy SSP API
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:08:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090430070858.GA3242@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f17812d70904291931o7bbf4df6g2827bdb28920f82b@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:31:53AM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > The transfers happen under control of PCON not the PXA; PCON asserts a
> > GPIO to activate the DMA to control when the transfer happens.
>
> That's too bad then. Does that GPIO act like a chip select or it's just a
> signal to inform the host to do a transfer? And it also depends on the
> SCLK direction.
>
> If the GPIO behaves like an IRQ to inform the host for a transfer, maybe
> the driver can arrange a transfer initiated by that event.
I don't know what the timing requirement is. What I do know is what
the current code does, which is to use the signal to control the
transmit DMA when PCON wants to transfer data.
Now, remember that PCON has a habbit of resetting the PXA when things
happen that it doesn't like, I really don't want to go round
experimenting with this thing; as already stated it's really not worth
trying to merge this code if that's what will be required.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 5:06 [RFC PATCH 3/5] pxa: clean up the legacy SSP API Eric Miao
2009-04-23 8:24 ` Mark Brown
2009-04-28 22:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-04-28 23:06 ` Daniel Ribeiro
2009-04-29 2:18 ` Eric Miao
2009-04-29 7:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-04-29 8:21 ` Mark Brown
2009-04-29 8:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-04-29 9:14 ` Eric Miao
2009-04-29 18:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-04-30 2:31 ` Eric Miao
2009-04-30 7:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090430070858.GA3242@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=bshen9@marvell.com \
--cc=drwyrm@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=philipp.zabel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.