From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:10:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20090430111042.GA12809@elte.hu> References: <20090416002712.GX8311@plum> <200904161201.13409.trenn@suse.de> <20090416174217.GY8311@plum> <20090416224507.GA31984@srcf.ucam.org> <20090428193303.GC6968@plum> <20090428195348.GA8376@srcf.ucam.org> <20090429213930.GE6968@plum> <20090429220037.GA8604@srcf.ucam.org> <20090430072556.GD16737@elte.hu> <20090430095414.GA19462@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:58878 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751335AbZD3LKy (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:10:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090430095414.GA19462@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , Thomas Renninger , linux-kernel , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org * Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:25:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > OTOH, if you rely on me figuring out which patch to revert and what > > to do, it will take an indeterminate amount of time - together with > > all the other items in my 'would be nice to hack on, given a bit of > > free time' queue :) > > Here's Darrick's patch: thanks - i've applied this and started testing it. I suspect 1-2 days of test-time should be enough to see if it breaks this box in any way. Ingo