From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:28:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904301928.38873@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F9565E.40804@gslab.com>
On Donnerstag 30 April 2009 Milind Dumbare wrote:
> I have heard of XFS's performance is not good as compared to EXT3
> when the filesystem(disk) is 80% filled with data. Is it true? I have
> went through lots of performance documents of both XFS and EXT3 but
> could not find such performance benchmarking (for 80% full
> filesystems).
>
> Any numbers or pointers to other documents are appreciated.
Never heard that before. Where did you hear this?
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 7:42 EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem Milind Dumbare
2009-04-30 17:28 ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
2009-04-30 18:34 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-30 18:34 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-18 13:03 ` Milind
2009-05-18 13:03 ` Milind
2009-05-18 13:17 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-18 13:17 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-20 5:43 ` Milind
2009-05-20 5:43 ` Milind
2009-05-20 10:50 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-20 10:50 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-20 11:51 ` Milind
2009-05-20 11:51 ` Milind
2009-05-20 14:20 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-20 14:20 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-20 12:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-20 12:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904301928.38873@zmi.at \
--to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.