All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux I2C <linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] i2c: Get rid of the legacy binding model
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:14:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905021214.02937.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090502113856.39940f1e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>

On Saturday 02 May 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
>  Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |   10 -
>  Documentation/i2c/writing-clients          |   16 -
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c                     |  366 +++--------------------------
>  include/linux/i2c.h                        |   57 +----

Which makes all but patch #4 *very* easy to review.
All they do is remove code.  Unless that breaks a
build, those removals have a hard time making any
trouble.  ;)


>  4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 401 deletions(-)
> 
> From a binary perspective, "size" announces an 18% shrink.

And Linux now builds without all those warnings, yes?

Plus from a code complexity perspective, it's even
better ... it removes 100% of the high level confusion
associated with that legacy model, and the bugs and
fragility caused by that.  (Or maybe I should say
that it *finishes* removing that.)

Glad to see this.  I presume this will sit in -next
for a while and merge in 2.6.31-early?

- Dave

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-02 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-02  9:38 [PATCH 0/6] i2c: Get rid of the legacy binding model Jean Delvare
     [not found] ` <20090502113856.39940f1e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-02  9:39   ` [PATCH 1/6] i2c: Kill client_register and client_unregister methods Jean Delvare
2009-05-02  9:40   ` [PATCH 2/6] i2c: Get rid of the legacy binding model Jean Delvare
     [not found]     ` <20090502114020.41c38247-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-02 19:03       ` David Brownell
     [not found]         ` <200905021203.43974.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-03  7:25           ` Jean Delvare
2009-05-02  9:41   ` [PATCH 3/6] i2c: Drop i2c_probe function Jean Delvare
2009-05-02  9:42   ` [PATCH 4/6] i2c: Merge i2c_attach_client into i2c_new_device Jean Delvare
2009-05-02  9:43   ` [PATCH 5/6] i2c: Kill is_newstyle_driver Jean Delvare
2009-05-02  9:45   ` [PATCH 6/6] i2c: Kill the redundant client list Jean Delvare
2009-05-02 18:16   ` [PATCH 0/6] i2c: Get rid of the legacy binding model David Brownell
2009-05-02 19:14   ` David Brownell [this message]
     [not found]     ` <200905021214.02937.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-03  7:05       ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905021214.02937.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b-ybekhbn/0ldr7s880joybq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.