Re: [Qemu-devel] PATCH: add missing (dummy) raw_aio_ioctl() for FreeBSD case

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>]

On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
>  
>  static int raw_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs, unsigned long int req, void *buf)
>  {
> -    return -ENOTSUP;
> +    BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> +
> +    return ioctl(s->fd, req, buf);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AIO
> +static BlockDriverAIOCB *raw_aio_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs,
> +        unsigned long int req, void *buf,
> +        BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, void *opaque)
> +{
> +    BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> +    RawAIOCB *acb;
> +
> +    if (fd_open(bs) < 0)
> +        return NULL;
> +
> +    acb = qemu_aio_get(bs, cb, opaque);
> +    if (!acb)
> +        return NULL;
> +    acb->aiocb.aio_fildes = s->fd;
> +    acb->aiocb.ev_signo = SIGUSR2;
> +    acb->aiocb.aio_offset = 0;
> +    acb->aiocb.aio_flags = 0;
> +
> +    acb->next = posix_aio_state->first_aio;
> +    posix_aio_state->first_aio = acb;
> +
> +    acb->aiocb.aio_ioctl_buf = buf;
> +    acb->aiocb.aio_ioctl_cmd = req;
> +    if (qemu_paio_ioctl(&acb->aiocb) < 0) {
> +        raw_aio_remove(acb);
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +
> +    return &acb->common;
>  }
> +#endif

Shouldn't we just make these implementations totally unconditional
(bdrv_ioctl) or conditional on CONFIG_AIO only (bdrv_aio_ioctl)?

I can't think of any Posix-ish operating system that wouldn't provide
the ioctl system call.