From: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: avoid leaking eip, esp, or wchan to non-privileged processes (fwd)
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:11:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090503191124.27b3bf45@chukar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0905040917240.20251@tundra.namei.org>
On Mon, 4 May 2009 09:27:29 +1000 (EST) James Morris wrote:
> This patch needs some review.
Indeed.
> Note that stable@kernel.org typically backport already-reviewed and
> applied patches. I think security@kernel.org is for reporting
> problems in a non-public way (whereas, this is already public
> knowledge).
I realize (now :) that I didn't get this out to all of the right folks,
thanks for doing that. I didn't realize security@kernel.org was only
for non-public security problems, though. Maybe there needs to be a
'security maintainer' separate from that list? Or maybe there is one
and I just didn't find that person in MAINTAINERS?
It would seem that the 'start_stack' value output by /proc/pid/stat
should also only be available to processes that can ptrace ... that was
not part of my original patch, but I think should be added ...
jake
--
Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-04 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-03 23:27 [PATCH] proc: avoid leaking eip, esp, or wchan to non-privileged processes (fwd) James Morris
2009-05-03 23:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-04 1:11 ` Jake Edge [this message]
2009-05-04 14:38 ` Greg KH
2009-05-04 6:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 13:22 ` Jake Edge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090503191124.27b3bf45@chukar \
--to=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.