From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: tulip_rxtx_stop() on Cobalt Qube2 Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 21:45:43 +0200 Message-ID: <200905032145.44294.florian@openwrt.org> References: <200905011238.59345.florian@openwrt.org> <20090503113209.GC6617@lackof.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca To: Grant Grundler Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:37262 "EHLO mail-ew0-f224.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751303AbZECTps convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 May 2009 15:45:48 -0400 Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3437968ewy.37 for ; Sun, 03 May 2009 12:45:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090503113209.GC6617@lackof.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Grant, Le Sunday 03 May 2009 13:32:09 Grant Grundler, vous avez =E9crit=A0: > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 12:38:57PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: > I added the additional output. I'll need to grab the manuals and > look up the bits. That would be great, thanks. > > > eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII#1 link partner capability of= 45e1. > > > > The interface is still fully functional, shall we increase the time= ount > > in tulip_stop_rxtx() to prevent this message from appearing ? > > I expect the timeout (1.3ms) is long enough to cover "normal" cases. > If something is taking longer than "normal", I'd like to know. > > If increasing it to 1.5 or 2ms makes this go away, I don't > think I'll object. Neither 1.5 nor 2 ms prevent this message from showing up. I have not c= hecked=20 CoLo but maybe the bootloader has already configured the Ethernet inter= faces=20 and therefore this check fails. --=20 Best regards, Florian Fainelli Email : florian@openwrt.org http://openwrt.org -------------------------------