All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
To: <security@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Subject: [PATCH] proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:51:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090504125114.5e391564@chukar> (raw)


This is essentially v2 of "[PATCH] proc: avoid leaking eip, esp, or
wchan to non-privileged processes", adding some of Eric Biederman's
suggestions as well as the start_stack change (only give out that
address if the process is ptrace()-able).  This has been tested with ps
and top without any ill effects being seen.

proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes

By using the same test as is used for /proc/pid/maps and /proc/pid/smaps,
only allow processes that can ptrace() a given process to see information
that might be used to bypass address space layout randomization (ASLR).
These include eip, esp, wchan, and start_stack in /proc/pid/stat as well
as the non-symbolic output from /proc/pid/wchan.

ASLR can be bypassed by sampling eip as shown by the proof-of-concept code
at http://code.google.com/p/fuzzyaslr/  As part of a presentation
(http://www.cr0.org/paper/to-jt-linux-alsr-leak.pdf) esp and wchan were also
noted as possibly usable information leaks as well.  The start_stack address
also leaks potentially useful information.

Cc: Stable Team <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
---
 fs/proc/array.c |   13 +++++++++----
 fs/proc/base.c  |    5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 7e4877d..725a650 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
 #include <linux/delayacct.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/tracehook.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
@@ -352,6 +353,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 	char state;
 	pid_t ppid = 0, pgid = -1, sid = -1;
 	int num_threads = 0;
+	int permitted;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	unsigned long long start_time;
 	unsigned long cmin_flt = 0, cmaj_flt = 0;
@@ -364,11 +366,14 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 
 	state = *get_task_state(task);
 	vsize = eip = esp = 0;
+	permitted = ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
 	mm = get_task_mm(task);
 	if (mm) {
 		vsize = task_vsize(mm);
-		eip = KSTK_EIP(task);
-		esp = KSTK_ESP(task);
+		if (permitted) {
+			eip = KSTK_EIP(task);
+			esp = KSTK_ESP(task);
+		}
 	}
 
 	get_task_comm(tcomm, task);
@@ -424,7 +429,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 		unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
 	}
 
-	if (!whole || num_threads < 2)
+	if (permitted && (!whole || num_threads < 2))
 		wchan = get_wchan(task);
 	if (!whole) {
 		min_flt = task->min_flt;
@@ -476,7 +481,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 		rsslim,
 		mm ? mm->start_code : 0,
 		mm ? mm->end_code : 0,
-		mm ? mm->start_stack : 0,
+		(permitted && mm) ? mm->start_stack : 0,
 		esp,
 		eip,
 		/* The signal information here is obsolete.
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index aa763ab..fb45615 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -322,7 +322,10 @@ static int proc_pid_wchan(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
 	wchan = get_wchan(task);
 
 	if (lookup_symbol_name(wchan, symname) < 0)
-		return sprintf(buffer, "%lu", wchan);
+		if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
+			return 0;
+		else
+			return sprintf(buffer, "%lu", wchan);
 	else
 		return sprintf(buffer, "%s", symname);
 }
-- 
1.6.2.2


-- 
Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net

             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-04 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-04 18:51 Jake Edge [this message]
2009-05-04 19:00 ` [Security] [PATCH] proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes Linus Torvalds
2009-05-04 19:51   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-04 20:20     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 22:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-04 23:26         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-04 23:54         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-05  7:51           ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-05 15:17             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-05 15:35               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-05 16:18                 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05 16:10               ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05  5:50         ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05  6:31           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-05  8:14             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-05 19:52               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-05 20:22                 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05 21:20                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-06 10:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 10:30                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 16:25                     ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 16:48                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-06 17:57                         ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07  0:50                           ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 15:02                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 18:14                               ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 18:21                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 18:41                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 19:24                                   ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 15:16                           ` Florian Weimer
2009-05-07 16:55                             ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 17:53                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-07 18:42                                 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 20:09                         ` [patch] random: make get_random_int() more random Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 20:41                           ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 20:51                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 21:10                               ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 21:24                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-14 22:47                           ` Jake Edge
2009-05-14 22:55                             ` [Security] " Linus Torvalds
2009-05-15 13:47                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-15 15:10                                 ` Jake Edge
2009-05-16 10:00                                 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-05-16 10:39                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-16 12:02                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-16 14:00                                       ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-16 14:28                                         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-16 14:57                                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-16 15:09                                             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-16 14:32                                       ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-16 13:58                                     ` Willy Tarreau
2009-05-16 15:23                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-16 15:47                                         ` Willy Tarreau
2009-05-16 15:54                                         ` Oliver Neukum
2009-05-16 16:05                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-16 16:17                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-15  1:16                           ` Américo Wang
2009-05-06 20:25                       ` [Security] [PATCH] proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 20:52                         ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05  8:58           ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090504125114.5e391564@chukar \
    --to=jake@lwn.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.