All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] execute kvm_init_vcpu in the end of pc_new_cpu
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:03:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090506140320.GC26401@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090506135306.GC10705@amt.cnet>

On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:53:06AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:16:19PM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > When we create a new vcpu, we need to make sure that
> > all of the state it is going to use (apic state, for example)
> > already exists. We can do it nicely by making sure kvm_init_vcpu
> > is executed after everything else in cpu creation.
> > 
> > After that, the first call to KVM_SET_LAPIC ioctl will not find an
> > existant vcpu. So we introduce a function that tell us that the vcpu
> > is already initialized, and is it safe to call the ioctl. Otherwise,
> > just don't botter.
> 
> Why did you decide to drop the additional wait vcpu->inited thing you
> had in the previous patch? I think its nice to make the synchronization
> explicit. 
Explicit is good. Not needed is even better.

If we make sure to call kvm_vcpu_init() after everything is already initialized,
we avoid the need to have any kind of sync at all, since it serializes
naturally.

> 
> Isnt your current solution somewhat trickier?
I believe it is simpler.

> 
> And if you disagree with me (which you should avoid for safety reasons),
> you need to regenerate the patch since it'll reject against qemu-kvm.git
> as of today.
I can do that happily (both disagreeing with you, and regenerating the patch)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-06  3:16 [PATCH] execute kvm_init_vcpu in the end of pc_new_cpu Glauber Costa
2009-05-06 13:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-06 14:03   ` Glauber Costa [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-06 14:10 Glauber Costa
2009-05-06 14:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-05-06 15:17   ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-06 15:43     ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090506140320.GC26401@poweredge.glommer \
    --to=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.