From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [212.227.126.188] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M1i6Z-0004Mg-Sg for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 16:28:16 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain (port-87-234-225-18.static.qsc.de [87.234.225.18]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKv1o-1M1i0j0Tm2-000jAN; Wed, 06 May 2009 16:22:13 +0200 Received: from christian.taskit.de (unknown [192.168.4.114]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E55A7B78B for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 16:20:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:22:12 +0200 From: Christian Glindkamp To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20090506162212.7cd43f30@christian.taskit.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19jop64E+tse2j2I6s2gOKtrL7zmIpqdklQ2y7 mi+iD8e8oMRoCZaFuBOi11PXuU4DEKpokUy6t4yQK0TV+owjh0 +ChgvtA/9Fd3kjD5WfDnw== Subject: Building jamvm and cacao (cacao is missing a patch) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 14:28:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I'm trying to build jamvm from stable/2009. This implicitly builds cacao. As I see it this happens because cacao provides java2-runtime and classpath rdepends on it. The problem is, that cacao does not build because of a missing patch. In revision af5fcda66139e002d098c0df952b43c455806aba cacao-disable-stackbase-check.patch was added to SRC_URI but the patch itself was not committed. Reverting the commit at least allowed me to continue the build of jamvm. I also checked the dev branch and it is missing the patch, too. So this patch should be added to both branches (or the patch removed from SRC_URI if it is obsolete). On a sidenote: Why is bitbake building cacao at all, jamvm already provides java2-runtime? Regards, Christian Glindkamp