All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: michael@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msi-x: let drivers retry when not enough vectors
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 18:28:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905071828.33593.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241691830.24385.6.camel@concordia>

On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:23:50 Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 03:53 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 05:40:15PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > It's indeed weird. Why the semantic of pci_enable_msix can be changed
> > > to "enable msix, or tell me how many vector do you have"? You can
> > > simply call pci_msix_table_size() to get what you want, also without
> > > any more work, no? I can't understand...
> >
> > Here's a good example.  Let's suppose you have a driver which supports
> > two different models of cards, one has 16 MSI-X interrupts, the other
> > has 10.  You can call pci_enable_msix() asking for 16 vectors.  If your
> > card is model A, you get 16 interrupts.  If your card is model B, it says
> > "you can have 10".
> >
> > This is less work in the driver (since it must implement falling back to
> > a smaller number of interrupts *anyway*) than interrogating the card to
> > find out how many interrupts there are, then requesting the right number,
> > and still having the fallback path which is going to be less tested.
>
> Not to mention that there's no guarantee that you'll get as many
> interrupts as the device supports, so you should really be coding to
> cope with that anyway. Like the example in MSI-HOWTO.txt:
>
> 197 static int foo_driver_enable_msix(struct foo_adapter *adapter, int
> nvec) 198 {
> 199         while (nvec >= FOO_DRIVER_MINIMUM_NVEC) {
> 200                 rc = pci_enable_msix(adapter->pdev,
> 201                                      adapter->msix_entries, nvec);
> 202                 if (rc > 0)
> 203                         nvec = rc;
> 204                 else
> 205                         return rc;
> 206         }
> 207
> 208         return -ENOSPC;
> 209 }
>
> So I agree, this patch is an improvement.
>
Oh yeah.

Forgot irq counts can also be changed from time to time.

OK, there should be a loop, so that's fine. :)

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-07 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-07  8:28 [PATCH] msi-x: let drivers retry when not enough vectors Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07  8:51 ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07  8:51 ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07  9:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07  9:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07  9:10     ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07  9:31       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07  9:31         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07  9:10     ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07  9:27   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-07  9:27   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-07  9:40     ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07  9:40     ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07  9:53       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-07 10:19         ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 10:19         ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 10:32           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07 10:32             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07 23:55           ` Rusty Russell
2009-05-08  0:22             ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-08  0:22             ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-08  0:28             ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-08  0:28               ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-12 21:28             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-12 21:28             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07 23:55           ` Rusty Russell
2009-05-07 10:23         ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-07 10:28           ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2009-05-07 10:28           ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 10:44           ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-07 10:44           ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-07 11:57             ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-07 11:57             ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-07 10:23         ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-07  9:53       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-06-11 18:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-11 18:28 ` Jesse Barnes
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-07  8:28 Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905071828.33593.sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.