From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2_cluster_lock: code cleanup for redundant assignment
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:08:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090507190818.GA15816@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A0328DC.6050702@suse.de>
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:30:52AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> In fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c:ocfs2_cluster_lock(), after label 'out:' the code is:
>
> 1373 if (wait && arg_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK &&
> 1374 mw.mw_mask & (OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY|OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED)) {
> 1375 wait = 0;
> 1376 if (lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, &mw))
> 1377 ret = -EAGAIN;
> 1378 else
> 1379 goto again;
> 1380 }
>
> On L1375 variable 'wait' is assigned to 0. But if execution path goes to L1379
> and jumps to label 'again:' on L1262, there is already an assignment to 'wait'
> on L1263:
>
> 1262 again:
> 1263 wait = 0;
> 1264
>
> The previous 'wait = 0' on L1375 is redundant in this case. This patch removes
> such a redundant variable assignment.
NAK. You're correct that the assignment is redundant, but the
compiler is smart enough to figure it out. The current code is more
readable - it's obvious right there that NONBLOCk &&
BLOCKED|BUSY means we shouldn't wait. With your change, it's not
obvious - someone has to go down through the code to discover that wait
is cleared at again:. Even if they find that wait is cleared, they
don't have an obvious clue as to the reason.
Joel
--
"I always thought the hardest questions were those I could not answer.
Now I know they are the ones I can never ask."
- Charlie Watkins
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 18:30 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2_cluster_lock: code cleanup for redundant assignment Coly Li
2009-05-07 18:50 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-05-08 6:03 ` Coly Li
2009-05-07 19:08 ` Joel Becker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090507190818.GA15816@ca-server1.us.oracle.com \
--to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.