All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2_cluster_lock: code cleanup for	redundant assignment
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:08:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090507190818.GA15816@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A0328DC.6050702@suse.de>

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:30:52AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> In fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c:ocfs2_cluster_lock(), after label 'out:' the code is:
> 
> 1373         if (wait && arg_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK &&
> 1374             mw.mw_mask & (OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY|OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED)) {
> 1375                 wait = 0;
> 1376                 if (lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, &mw))
> 1377                         ret = -EAGAIN;
> 1378                 else
> 1379                         goto again;
> 1380         }
> 
> On L1375 variable 'wait' is assigned to 0. But if execution path goes to L1379
> and jumps to label 'again:' on L1262, there is already an assignment to 'wait'
> on L1263:
> 
> 1262 again:
> 1263         wait = 0;
> 1264
> 
> The previous 'wait = 0' on L1375 is redundant in this case. This patch removes
> such a redundant variable assignment.

	NAK.  You're correct that the assignment is redundant, but the
compiler is smart enough to figure it out.  The current code is more
readable - it's obvious right there that NONBLOCk &&
BLOCKED|BUSY means we shouldn't wait.  With your change, it's not
obvious - someone has to go down through the code to discover that wait
is cleared at again:.  Even if they find that wait is cleared, they
don't have an obvious clue as to the reason.

Joel

-- 

"I always thought the hardest questions were those I could not answer.
 Now I know they are the ones I can never ask."
			- Charlie Watkins

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-07 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-07 18:30 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2_cluster_lock: code cleanup for redundant assignment Coly Li
2009-05-07 18:50 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-05-08  6:03   ` Coly Li
2009-05-07 19:08 ` Joel Becker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090507190818.GA15816@ca-server1.us.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.