From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763695AbZEGWhz (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 18:37:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753356AbZEGWhq (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 18:37:46 -0400 Received: from mail1007.centrum.cz ([90.183.38.137]:52007 "EHLO mail1007.centrum.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752941AbZEGWhp (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 18:37:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 00:37:39 +0200 From: To: Cc: , X-Mailer: Centrum Mail 5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: <200905080037.19722@centrum.cz> References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <20090507120948.GA1531@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20090507120948.GA1531@ucw.cz> Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Well... > > >To summarise disadvantages: > >- only core has 8000 LoC >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace). >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality. >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing > To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works. (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.) >_______________________________________________ >TuxOnIce-devel mailing list >TuxOnIce-devel@lists.tuxonice.net >http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-devel >