Re: [lm-sensors] Specific configurations - Gigabyte mainboard

[Hubert Kario <hka@qbs.com.pl>]

On Monday 11 May 2009 13:17:22 you wrote:
> Hi Hubert,
>
> On Sat, 9 May 2009 12:27:09 +0200, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > Hello everybody!
> > I've created a mainboard specific configuration for Gigabyte EP45-DS3P:
> >
> > == snip => > chip "it87-*" "it8712-*" "it8716-*" "it8718-*" "it8720-*"
>
> Which actual IT87xxF chip does the EP45-DS3P have?
IT8720, I'll check when I'll be able to how it's visible by lspci/sensors, I 
don't know when it will be though, maybe today evening, maybe in a week's time
>
> >         label in0 "Vcore"
> >         label in1 "Vram"
> >         label in2 "+3.3V"
> >
> >         label in3 "+5V"
> > 	# Standard resistor
> >         compute in3 @ * ( 6.8/10+1), @ / (6.8/10+1)
> >
> >         ignore in4
> >
> >         label in5 "+12V"
> > 	# that's a bit weird, as the value (29.6) is close to typical resistor,
> > 	# but it does give proper results (in line with what a multimeter
> > 	# and BIOS show)
>
> Could be that the 10 isn't correct. Not that it really matters
> though... what matters is that the scaling factor is correct.
>
> >         compute in5 @ * (29.6/10+1), @ / (29.6/10+1)
> >
> >         ignore in6
> >
> > 	# not sure about this one
> >         label in7 "5VSB"
> >         compute in7 @ * (6.8/10+1), @ / (6.8/10+1)
> >
> >         label in8 "Vbat"
> >
> > 	# labels are after the ones printed on the mainboard
> >         label fan1 "CPU_FAN"
> >         label fan2 "SYS_FAN2"
> >         label fan3 "PWR_FAN"
> >         label fan4 "SYS_FAN1"
>
> These labels are ugly. What about:
yes, I know, but these are the exact ones that are printed on the mainboard...
and besides CPU_FAN, they can be connected to any fan one wishes (northbridge 
is passively cooled in this mainboard)
>
>         label fan1 "CPU Fan"
>         label fan2 "Sys Fan 2"
>         label fan3 "Power Fan"
>         label fan4 "Sys Fan 2"
>
> >         label temp1 "Sys Temp"
> >         label temp2 "Tcase Temp"
>
> Why "Tcase" and not just "Case"?
because it's the Tcase temp of a CPU (temperature of an IHS)

I bet "Case Temp" would be read as ambient temperature by most people 
(temperature inside the computer case), making it Tcase should clear the 
confusion, especially when after putting "tcase temp" to google one does 
recive "C2Q/C2D Temp Guide" as first result and "Tcase/Tjunction/Temp 
question" as second
>
> >         ignore temp3
> > == snip =>
> Yes it does, thanks for your contribution!
np

BTW, I couldn't use "compute" with "Core 0" and "Core 1" labels (I wanted to 
calibrate my core temperatures)
line:

 compute "Core 0" @ +3, @ -3

was completely ignored...
-- 
Hubert Kario
QBS - Quality Business Software
ul. Ksawerów 30/85
02-656 Warszawa
POLAND
tel. +48 (22) 646-61-51, 646-74-24
fax +48 (22) 646-61-50



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors