Re: new blktrace release tag?

[Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>]

On Mon, May 11 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, May 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
> > >> Hi Jens,
> > >> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
> > >> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
> > >> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
> > > 
> > > Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Next time could you keep the tarball snapshot a bit more consistent with
> > previous versions, in particular with a top-level dir?  :)
> > 
> > # tar tvjf blktrace-1.0.1.tar.bz2
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root       112 2009-05-11 07:00 .gitignore
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root     18009 2009-05-11 07:00 COPYING
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1992 2009-05-11 07:00 Makefile
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      5030 2009-05-11 07:00 README
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1109 2009-05-11 07:00 act_mask.c
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1362 2009-05-11 07:00 barrier.h
> > ...
> 
> Dang, I didn't realize that git archive didn't include a top level dir
> (I just switched my scripts to use that last week). I'll fix that up and
> re-generate the tar balls, thanks for letting me know!

Done, it should be ok now.

-- 
Jens Axboe