From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: TWL4030: Wait RAMP_DELAY on headsetl_event: POST_PMD Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:52:29 +0300 Message-ID: <20090512145229.bf93fb01.jhnikula@gmail.com> References: <1242040465-10835-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <200905121350.26415.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <20090512141937.08450516.jhnikula@gmail.com> <200905121431.41207.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f175.google.com (mail-ew0-f175.google.com [209.85.219.175]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1484B103840 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 13:50:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so4500783ewy.32 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 04:50:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200905121431.41207.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: "sakoman@gmail.com" , "anuj.aggarwal@ti.com" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , "getarunks@gmail.com" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, 12 May 2009 14:31:41 +0300 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > Do difference IMO. > > Is it better or worst? A day between the tests and no noticeable difference to my ears/memory. > Can you try also with: > Tests below are tested with your hack patch on top of your yesterday's patch. > amixer sset 'HS ramp delay' '55/40/27 ms' Probably a little bit lower 'tuck' than with '27/20/14 ms'. > amixer sset 'HS ramp delay' '109/81/55 ms' Again a bit lower than with '55/40/27 ms' but now I hear silent beep (!) when starting the aplay and about 5 s after stopping it followed by the 'tuck'. Length of beep was less than half of second. Probably this this is the issue reported by Anuj? -- Jarkko