All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:26:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090512155637.19380.9114.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3291 bytes --]

Hi,

>On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:16 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:16:14PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> 
> Hi Subrata,
> 
> > 
> > With gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090429 (prerelease), i get the following build warning:
> 
> Patch looks good (you can add a 
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>)
> But I don't maintain this code anymore. Please resend to x86@kernel.org
> cc linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org for merge.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Andi


With gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090429 (prerelease), i get the following build warning:

CC      arch/x86/kernel/signal.o
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c: In function ‘sys_sigreturn’:
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:573: warning: ‘set.sig[1]’ may be used uninitialized in this function

On investigation i found that this is because of the evaluation
precedence of the expression below:

569 unsigned long sys_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
570 {
571         struct sigframe __user *frame;
572         unsigned long ax;
573         sigset_t set;
574 
575         frame = (struct sigframe __user *)(regs->sp - 8);
576 
577         if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
578                 goto badframe;
579         if (__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask) || (_NSIG_WORDS > 1
580                 && __copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
581                                     sizeof(frame->extramask))))

The initialization for set.sig[1] may not occur if
	__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask)
evalutes to true. So, the compiler is complaining.

I have devised a small patch for this which wanes away this warning
without changing the conditional evaluation criteria. Let me know if
you like this patch.

582                 goto badframe;
583 
584         sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
585         spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
586         current->blocked = set;
587         recalc_sigpending();
588         spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
589 
590         if (restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->sc, &ax))
591                 goto badframe;
592         return ax;
593 
594 badframe:
595         signal_fault(regs, frame, "sigreturn");
596 
597         return 0;
598 }

Signed-Off-By: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
---

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c	2009-05-12 10:59:24.000000000 +0530
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c	2009-05-12 16:57:32.000000000 +0530
@@ -576,9 +576,10 @@ unsigned long sys_sigreturn(struct pt_re
 
 	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
 		goto badframe;
-	if (__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask) || (_NSIG_WORDS > 1
-		&& __copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
-				    sizeof(frame->extramask))))
+
+        if ( (__copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
+                sizeof(frame->extramask)) && _NSIG_WORDS > 1) || 
+                __get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask))
 		goto badframe;
 
 	sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);

---
Regards--
Subrata


             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-12 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12 15:56 Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-05-13  2:20 ` [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-13  9:06   ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-13 13:53     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-13 20:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-14  0:24         ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-14  6:30 Subrata Modak
2009-05-14  7:38 ` [PATCH] " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-14  9:12 Subrata Modak
2009-05-15  2:57 ` [PATCH] " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-15  3:32 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-15 10:16   ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-18  3:36     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-18  6:38       ` Subrata Modak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090512155637.19380.9114.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.