From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:26:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090512155637.19380.9114.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3291 bytes --]
Hi,
>On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:16 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:16:14PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>
> Hi Subrata,
>
> >
> > With gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090429 (prerelease), i get the following build warning:
>
> Patch looks good (you can add a
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>)
> But I don't maintain this code anymore. Please resend to x86@kernel.org
> cc linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org for merge.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Andi
With gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090429 (prerelease), i get the following build warning:
CC arch/x86/kernel/signal.o
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c: In function ‘sys_sigreturn’:
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:573: warning: ‘set.sig[1]’ may be used uninitialized in this function
On investigation i found that this is because of the evaluation
precedence of the expression below:
569 unsigned long sys_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
570 {
571 struct sigframe __user *frame;
572 unsigned long ax;
573 sigset_t set;
574
575 frame = (struct sigframe __user *)(regs->sp - 8);
576
577 if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
578 goto badframe;
579 if (__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask) || (_NSIG_WORDS > 1
580 && __copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
581 sizeof(frame->extramask))))
The initialization for set.sig[1] may not occur if
__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask)
evalutes to true. So, the compiler is complaining.
I have devised a small patch for this which wanes away this warning
without changing the conditional evaluation criteria. Let me know if
you like this patch.
582 goto badframe;
583
584 sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
585 spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
586 current->blocked = set;
587 recalc_sigpending();
588 spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
589
590 if (restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->sc, &ax))
591 goto badframe;
592 return ax;
593
594 badframe:
595 signal_fault(regs, frame, "sigreturn");
596
597 return 0;
598 }
Signed-Off-By: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c 2009-05-12 10:59:24.000000000 +0530
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c 2009-05-12 16:57:32.000000000 +0530
@@ -576,9 +576,10 @@ unsigned long sys_sigreturn(struct pt_re
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
goto badframe;
- if (__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask) || (_NSIG_WORDS > 1
- && __copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
- sizeof(frame->extramask))))
+
+ if ( (__copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
+ sizeof(frame->extramask)) && _NSIG_WORDS > 1) ||
+ __get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask))
goto badframe;
sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
---
Regards--
Subrata
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 15:56 Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-05-13 2:20 ` [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-13 9:06 ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-13 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-13 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-14 0:24 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-14 6:30 Subrata Modak
2009-05-14 7:38 ` [PATCH] " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-14 9:12 Subrata Modak
2009-05-15 2:57 ` [PATCH] " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-15 3:32 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-15 10:16 ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-18 3:36 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-18 6:38 ` Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090512155637.19380.9114.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.