From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: add comments to reflog? Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:35:54 +0300 Message-ID: <20090513103554.GC31593@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 13 12:37:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M4Bpd-0005Vq-SQ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:37:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757714AbZEMKgy (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 06:36:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755117AbZEMKgx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 06:36:53 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50866 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754135AbZEMKgx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 06:36:53 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4DAarKR018083 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 06:36:53 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4DAarQo028030 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 06:36:53 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (vpn-10-148.str.redhat.com [10.32.10.148]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4DAapZE025339 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 06:36:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I noticed that I am often doing this hack commit hack commit hack commit ... git tag -s works -m "works on xyz, must rewrite abc" git reset --hard HEAD~1 hack ... I only tag just in case I want to revisit the design. However, after I reset, I often forget how did I name the tag. It would be nice if reflog would show tag descriptions, which it does not seem to. Comments? -- MST