From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758166AbZEMLcv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 07:32:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752189AbZEMLcm (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 07:32:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f115.google.com ([209.85.222.115]:46644 "EHLO mail-pz0-f115.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbZEMLcl (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 07:32:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=A23CPzSOGyfJtQmEoStdweDzbyy5rfs/RUqv3J/HCirmtlpMamocuL0wQjbWgw0AFe r4bKQB8GrTGKkbSAhEMsA/TnKxgIbRE2x/OaoSiAVZJzdCUrHsRxYRE96wkXwcVjVKpL r/nRsMMcmKTqloN3Td/m7RyrhW24500T9UpYA= Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 19:33:57 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: GeunSik Lim Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, tovalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH]man-pages : section 9 for kernel api description. Message-ID: <20090513113357.GA11773@hack> References: <1242180268.31161.24.camel@centos51> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1242180268.31161.24.camel@centos51> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:04:28AM +0900, GeunSik Lim wrote: > > >Dear Michael Kerrisk, > >Are you maintainer of man-pages(man-pages-3.XX.tar.gz)? >I am not sure... Yes, he is. > >I use fedora 9 distribution as Linux based Desktop OS currently. >I have one proposal about "#> man " command. >Can you tell me your opinion about below patch? >Thanks reading. > >commit 45e950c98412c002c47254507a199731315c7c2b >Author: GeunSik,Lim >Date: Wed May 13 10:49:47 2009 +0900 > > Append Section 9 info of man command. > > We view description of the Linux kernel API with man command. > For example, > Fedoar9#> yum install kernel-doc* > Fedora9#> man kobject_rename or > Fedora9#> man kthread_create Why? Why do you want kernel api doc be in man pages? Why not just browsing the kernel source code? Kernel APIs are not stable at all, this is also a reason why you should not include their doc into man pages. -- Live like a child, think like the god.