From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760957AbZEMUZW (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 16:25:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761455AbZEMUYs (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 16:24:48 -0400 Received: from mail1011.centrum.cz ([90.183.38.141]:39588 "EHLO mail1011.centrum.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761417AbZEMUYr (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 16:24:47 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 311 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 16:24:47 EDT Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:19:25 +0200 From: To: Cc: , , X-Mailer: Centrum Mail 5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: <200905132219.19216@centrum.cz> References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <20090507120948.GA1531@ucw.cz> <200905080037.19722@centrum.cz> <20090510053840.GG1363@ucw.cz> <200905112319.8749@centrum.cz> <20090511212350.GA3397@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20090511212350.GA3397@elf.ucw.cz> Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ______________________________________________________________ > Od: pavel@ucw.cz > Komu: trekker.dk@centrum.cz > CC: tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Datum: 11.05.2009 23:24 > Předmět: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce > >Hi! > >> >> >To summarise disadvantages: >> >> > >> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC >> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace >> >> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace). >> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality. >> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing >> >> > >> >> >> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works. >> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.) >> >> >> > >> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram? >> >> Regarding hardware - >> >> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2 >> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT >> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II, AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT >> (binary driver for video card every time) > >Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should >be easy to test with init=/bin/bash. > Pavel Yes, that works - and after complete boot w/o loading binary driver resume works too.