From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 13 Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:36:11 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20090515.093611.94859942.ryusuke@osrg.net> References: <20090514193916.1d8e982e@simplux> <20090515.092143.09779544.ryusuke@osrg.net> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090515.092143.09779544.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, mniederle-RbZlAiThDcE@public.gmane.org Cc: milosdsax-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:21:43 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2009 19:39:16 +0200, "Michael Niederle" wrote: > > The todo-list mentions that more copies of the superblock are needed. I > > strongly agree! I think this should be one of the top items on the todo-list. > > > > Greetings, Michael > > The latest nilfs already has secondary super block in tail of > partition. But it looks insufficient for this pendrive problem. > > I think ensuring write on unmount should come before that. Just a quick note. The write on unmount is already _DONE_ on the source code. I here mean some enhanced operation like diskcache flushing. Ryusuke Konishi