From: Lance Tagliapietra <lancetag@Luminet.net>
To: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Amiga RTC kernel config [was: Re: m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison]
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:02:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090515170208.GB1530@luminet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2octulnkv.fsf@igel.home>
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:31:12AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Lance Tagliapietra <lancetag@Luminet.net> writes:
>
> > Now, there is a /dev/rtc device of type 10 135. Interestingly, though is that the
> > kernel is looking for an "rtc0" device based on the kernel config. So I'll make
> > that change to the kernel config and re-build and see what I get -- or would it
> > be a better approach to add a /dev/rtc0 c 10 135?
>
> I think you need a c 254 0 device if you use rtc-generic.
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I beleive I made a mistake here. I compiled my kernel (and the other 2.6.xx
kernels I have tried) were compiled with CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y instead of
CONFIG_GEN_RTC=Y and CONFIG_GEN_RTC_X=y which I have now determined are the
defaults for the m68k arch, and also the options used in my properly working
2.4.30 kernel.
That is why the "/dev/rtc0" showed up in the .config.
I am re-building my kernel to test.
Thanks,
--Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-15 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-03 7:28 m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-03 11:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-05-15 2:37 ` Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-15 9:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-05-15 9:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-05-15 17:02 ` Lance Tagliapietra [this message]
2009-05-15 20:05 ` Amiga RTC kernel config [was: Re: m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison] Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-06 6:44 ` m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison Kolbjørn Barmen
2009-05-06 17:45 ` Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-07 2:37 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090515170208.GB1530@luminet.net \
--to=lancetag@luminet.net \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.