All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set bit 1 in disabled processor's _STA
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 17:30:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090517143006.GJ3909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090517132741.GL27295@poweredge.glommer>

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:27:41AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:23:47AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 08:14:43AM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > > This patch sets bits 1 in disabled processor's _STA.
> > > According to the ACPI spec, this bit means:
> > >  "Set if the device is enabled and decoding its resources."
> > > 
> > > Without it, Windows 2008 device manager shows the processors
> > > as malfunctioning hardware.
> > > 
> > If you uncheck "show hidden devices" option in View menu of the
> > device manager you should see only enabled CPUs (bit 2 of _STA).
> Yes, that is what happens. But then, by checking "show hidden devices",
> the disabled processor appears, but are listed as malfunctioning.
> 
> Because of this, SVVP tests break without this patch.
> 
What kind of error?

> > This patch breaks resume from hibernate on windows 2008/vista.
> Oh god... do you have any idea why?
> 
> which bits should we set for everything to work?
Bit 1 should not be set :) What I think is happening windows finds more
CPUs on resume then it had before hibernate.

> It appears to me that having bit 2 cleared should do the right thing,
> but your test clearly indicate otherwise.

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-17 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-15 12:14 [PATCH] Set bit 1 in disabled processor's _STA Glauber Costa
2009-05-17  8:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-17 13:27   ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-17 14:30     ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2009-05-17 15:06       ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-17 15:21         ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-17 15:47           ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-18  6:58             ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-17 14:31   ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-17 14:32     ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-17 15:07       ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-17 15:30         ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-17 20:07           ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-18  0:47             ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-18  5:17             ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-18  5:44               ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-18  5:53                 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-18 11:39                   ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-18 11:40                     ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-18 12:40                       ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-18 12:42                         ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-18 12:59                           ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090517143006.GJ3909@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.