From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the tree Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:42:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20090518124232.GJ4140@kernel.dk> References: <20090518145318.c199842e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090518062747.GF4140@kernel.dk> <200905182204.54512.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:59482 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752230AbZERMmb (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 08:42:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905182204.54512.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Rusty Russell Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , Tejun Heo On Mon, May 18 2009, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2009 03:57:47 pm Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Mon, May 18 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Rusty, perhaps it would be easier if I took the SG_IO patch through the > > block tree? > > Thanks; they're orthogonal to the rest of my changes anyway. > > Here are the two patches (first one is a prereq). I've attached them, or you > can grab them out of linux-next or my patchqueue. I've massaged them into the block tree now. -- Jens Axboe