From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905181536.39508.johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vab5ci281.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> [Will merge to "master" soon]
>
> * ph/submodule-rebase (Fri Apr 24 09:06:38 2009 +1000) 1 commit
> + git-submodule: add support for --rebase.
Just a quick question before this ends up in 'master'. I'm sorry if this
has already been answered:
Why only --rebase, and not also --merge?
I certainly don't have anything against "git submodule update --rebase",
and I support its inclusion, but why not also "--merge"? While --rebase
calls "git rebase" instead of "git checkout", --merge would call "git
merge" instead. I believe there are useful workflows where --merge
would be a better fit than --rebase.
Now, my question should not stop this feature from going into 'master',
except for the fact that if we also want to support merge, we should
rename the associated config variable:
Instead of
submodule.<name>.rebase = true/false (false if unset)
we should have something like
submodule.<name>.resolve = checkout/rebase/merge (checkout if unset)
Hmm?
...Johan
--
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-17 8:05 What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17) Junio C Hamano
2009-05-17 9:45 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-17 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-17 18:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-17 11:41 ` David Aguilar
2009-05-18 13:36 ` Johan Herland [this message]
2009-05-18 19:40 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-05-18 21:55 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 0:35 ` [PATCH] git-submodule: add support for --merge Johan Herland
2009-05-19 1:33 ` What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17) Junio C Hamano
2009-05-19 7:23 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 8:17 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-19 8:45 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 11:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-19 13:26 ` git submodule update --merge (Was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)) Johan Herland
2009-05-25 11:59 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 18:33 ` git submodule update --merge Junio C Hamano
2009-05-25 18:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-25 19:04 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-05-25 19:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-25 22:48 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 22:10 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 23:15 ` git submodule update --merge (Was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)) Peter Hutterer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905181536.39508.johan@herland.net \
--to=johan@herland.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.