All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Martin Lottermoser <Martin.Lottermoser@t-online.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATA DMA problem leading to kernel panic on reading movie DVDs
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:19:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905191719.35543.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090518191207.GA7531@wanza.invalid>

On Monday 18 May 2009 21:12:07 Martin Lottermoser wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:35:09PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Martin, this is one of ATAPI drives which support UDMA66 but have broken
> > cable detection.  Since 2.6.26 we have a special quirk for it ide (commit
> > 3ced5c49bd2d1f2c7f769e3a54385883de63a652) and subsequent one in libata
> > (commit e9f3340673c1da32041f2a282b166c72cd78632e).
> > 
> > In your system's case the cable detection doesn't seem to work properly
> > which in turn results in all kind of later problems.
> > 
> > It could be that the quirk itself needs to be revised (I wonder if it was
> > originally tested with 40-wires cable) or maybe we need some other cable
> > detection fix...
> > 
> > Please:
> > 
> > * send 'hdparm --Istdout /dev/hdc' output
> > 
> > * try 2.6.30-rc6 (maybe 2.6.29.3 oops has been fixed already and we just
> >   need to backport it)
> > 
> > also connecting the drive using 80-wires cable and getting another hdparm
> > output (+ seeing if it helps the other problems) would be very useful.
> 
> I've done that now as well. Test runs with Debian's 2.6.26 and with 2.6.30-rc6
> show no problems: no disabling of DMA, no kernel panic.
> 
> The hdparm output ("hdparm --Istdout") is the same for a 40-wire cable and an
> 80-wire cable (checked under 2.6.26).

Thanks, this verifies that this drive just lacks proper cable detection.

[ BTW I guess that UDMA66 was added later, after the hardware design was
  ready but it is official.  Please see product spec for "[E-IDE] SH-S202N"
  at http://www.samsungodd.com/:

        "Data transfer mode: ... Ultra DMA Mode 4 : 66.6MB/sec" ]

> This indicates that your hypothesis above that it's a cable detection problem
> is correct.
> 
> Just out of curiosity: is this a bug on the drive's side or in the kernel?

Both. :)  However the root cause is a "problematic" device not the kernel.

> Or in other words: if the output of "hdparm -I" shows the drive as attached
> to be able to support UDMA4, is this a statement passed through unmodified
> from the drive or is this a deduction made by the kernel? I ask because

It comes from the drive.

> under 2.6.22.9 and 2.6.23.14 I got a message that "host side 80-wire cable
> detection failed".

Your host controller correctly detected 40-wire cable and complained about
it since drive supports UDMA66.  In later kernels we added workaround for it
and trusted the drive side cable detection only...

> Should anyone find a fix to correct/circumvent this problem in the kernel,
> I'ld be willing to test it on my system; just send a patch file or tell me
> where to pick it up.

Here is the patch for 2.6.30-rc6 to fix operation with 40-wire cable, please
test it (we have also oops in the error-recovery issue to fix but I'll try to
reproduce it locally some time later and ping you when I'm done / need help).

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ide: fix 40-wire cable detection for TSST SH-S202* ATAPI devices

Since 2.6.26 we support UDMA66 on ATAPI devices requiring IVB quirk:

  commit 8588a2b732928b343233af9b1855705b8286bed4
  ("ide: add SH-S202J to ivb_list[]")

We also later added support for more such devices in:

  commit e97564f362a93f8c248246c19828895950341252
  ("ide: More TSST drives with broken cable detection")

and in:

  commit 3ced5c49bd2d1f2c7f769e3a54385883de63a652
  ("ide: add TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S202H to ivb_list[]")

It turns out that such devices lack cable detection altogether
(which in turn results in incorrect detection of 40-wire cables
by our current cable detection strategy) so always handle them
by trusting host-side cable detection only.

Reported-by: Martin Lottermoser <Martin.Lottermoser@t-online.de>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ide/ide-iops.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
@@ -206,8 +206,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ide_in_drive_list);
 
 /*
  * Early UDMA66 devices don't set bit14 to 1, only bit13 is valid.
- * We list them here and depend on the device side cable detection for them.
- *
  * Some optical devices with the buggy firmwares have the same problem.
  */
 static const struct drive_list_entry ivb_list[] = {
@@ -251,10 +249,25 @@ u8 eighty_ninty_three(ide_drive_t *drive
 	 * - force bit13 (80c cable present) check also for !ivb devices
 	 *   (unless the slave device is pre-ATA3)
 	 */
-	if ((id[ATA_ID_HW_CONFIG] & 0x4000) ||
-	    (ivb && (id[ATA_ID_HW_CONFIG] & 0x2000)))
+	if (id[ATA_ID_HW_CONFIG] & 0x4000)
 		return 1;
 
+	if (ivb) {
+		const char *model = (char *)&id[ATA_ID_PROD];
+
+		if (strcmp("TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S202", model) == 0) {
+			/*
+			 * These ATAPI devices always report 80c cable
+			 * so we have to depend on the host in this case.
+			 */
+			if (hwif->cbl == ATA_CBL_PATA80)
+				return 1;
+		} else {
+			/* Depend on the device side cable detection. */
+			if (id[ATA_ID_HW_CONFIG] & 0x2000)
+				return 1;
+		}
+	}
 no_80w:
 	if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_UDMA33_WARNED)
 		return 0;

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-19 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-17  9:12 PATA DMA problem leading to kernel panic on reading movie DVDs Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-17 10:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 11:15   ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-17 12:14     ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-17 19:34       ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 19:45         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-17 19:50           ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 20:18             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-17 20:30               ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 22:48                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-18  6:32                   ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 17:59 ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-17 19:35   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-17 20:18     ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-18 16:40     ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-18 19:12     ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-19 15:19       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-05-19 18:29         ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-19 19:30           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 21:11             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 21:12             ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-19 21:31               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905191719.35543.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=Martin.Lottermoser@t-online.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.