From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 19 May 2009 18:30:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:54506 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id S20024636AbZESRaL (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>);
	Tue, 19 May 2009 18:30:11 +0100
Received: by vs166246.vserver.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.63)
	id 1M6T8k-0001Rk-Cn; Tue, 19 May 2009 17:30:10 +0000
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bc47xx : export ssb_watchdog_timer_set
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2009 19:29:20 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
References: <4A11DCBF.9000700@free.fr> <200905191524.20421.mb@bu3sch.de> <20090519170957.GA23711@linux-mips.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090519170957.GA23711@linux-mips.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905191929.21082.mb@bu3sch.de>
Return-Path: <mb@bu3sch.de>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 22828
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: mb@bu3sch.de
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

On Tuesday 19 May 2009 19:09:57 Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Maybe because I felt drivers/ssb/ was outside my jurisdiction - and unlike
> what alot of people may seem to think I'm not a full time MIPS kernel
> hacker.

Ok nice.

> I can deal with SSB patch if you so desire - but I have no experience with
> SSB, so I'd have somebody to rubberstamp non-trivial SSB patches before I
> queue them up.

 **Fwoo..
[stamp here]
      ..mppp**


Done. :)

> I can keep them either in the usual MIPS trees on 
> linux-mips.org or I could create a separate linux-ssb tree, depending on
> what seems to be sensible.  Also, reading the entry in the maintainers
> file I wonder if netdev is really the list of a choice?

Yes it is, because the bus is only used on networking devices.
(Ethernet cards, wireless cards, and network routers)
I don't think you need to create a separate tree. ssb is pretty mature. There
won't be that many patches.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.