From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755223AbZESOlh (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 10:41:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752497AbZESOlT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 10:41:19 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:53638 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751216AbZESOlS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 10:41:18 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: add missing __dev{init,exit} markings Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:10:51 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-11-generic; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org References: <1242632349-15894-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1242632349-15894-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905200010.51786.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 18 May 2009 05:09:09 pm Mike Frysinger wrote: > -static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > +static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) This makes sense, I think, but then it implies that virtio_dev_probe() should also be __devinit, right? And I look at pci_bus_probe(), and it's not __devinit. Is the PCI code just slack? Rusty.