From: Marek Kierdelewicz <marek@piasta.pl>
To: Eduardo Sachs <edu.sachs@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Firewall in Load Balance - Active/Active
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090525165720.39188eb5@catlap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e7107590905250529o686b331do322e7e5b8849478b@mail.gmail.com>
>Could have a Virtual IP for sending the requests to the two firewalls.
>Could have a ldirectord for gateways. Remember that the ldirectord is
>"load balance" only for ports TCP/UDP.
So you use third box. Solution I presented allows you to do
load-balancing on routers alone. Without ldirector.
>> You can use keepalived [1] to have two virtual gateway IP addresses
>> on the network - GW1 and GW2. Assign half of the clients staticly to
>> GW1,
>>...
>How would I disclose two gateways in the network if I have only one
>DHCP? Could create VLANs. Correct?
Vlans are not required. You can define more then one router-gateway on
one ethernet segment in dhcp server, example from one of my boxes:
shared-network seg1{
subnet 10.32.0.0 netmask 255.255.254.0 {
option subnet-mask 255.255.254.0;
option broadcast-address 10.32.1.255;
option routers 10.32.1.254; <---- first gateway definition
range 10.32.1.128 10.32.1.191;
}
subnet xx.xx.177.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.224;
option broadcast-address xx.xx.177.31;
option routers xx.xx.177.30; <---- second gateway definition
}
}
Cheers,
Marek Kierdelewicz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-25 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-25 11:46 Firewall in Load Balance - Active/Active Eduardo Sachs
2009-05-25 12:13 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2009-05-25 12:29 ` Eduardo Sachs
2009-05-25 14:57 ` Marek Kierdelewicz [this message]
2009-05-25 13:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-05-25 13:35 ` Eduardo Sachs
2009-05-25 13:57 ` Покотиленко Костик
2009-05-25 14:13 ` Choices for virtual IP failover (was Re: Firewall in Load Balance - Active/Active) Thomas Jacob
[not found] ` <000b01c9dd44$c81bf5c0$5853e140$@bourke@mobileinternet.com>
2009-05-25 14:31 ` Thomas Jacob
[not found] ` <000001c9dd57$5f2ae630$1d80b290$@bourke@mobileinternet.com>
2009-05-25 17:47 ` Thomas Jacob
2009-05-25 14:58 ` Tore Anderson
2009-05-25 15:27 ` Thomas Jacob
2009-05-26 18:39 ` Firewall in Load Balance - Active/Active Elvir Kuric
2009-05-26 23:04 ` Thomas Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090525165720.39188eb5@catlap \
--to=marek@piasta.pl \
--cc=edu.sachs@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.