All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_32KSYNCT_BASE
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:54:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528155431.GC32453@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090528152517.GB20736@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [090528 08:25]:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:23:06PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Use processor specific defines instead.
> > 
> > As an extra bonus, this patch fixes the problem of CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
> > calling sched_clock before we have things initialized:
> 
> Hmm.  I don't think sched_clock peculiarities should be handed by the
> clock source implementation.
> 
> This is really a generic kernel bug: lots of ARM architecture sched_clock
> implementations can not be called before things like IO memory has been
> setup - and that's something that mainline people have been made aware
> of repeatedly, and they've fixed the problems when they've come up.

Yeah agreed.
 
> Moreover, the issue of using clocksources for sched_clock is being
> discussed on the main ARM lists, with the possibility of the generic
> kernel-wide sched_clock implementation being based upon clock sources.
> 
> Whether that changes anything with this patch, I'm not entirely sure.

The clocksource and sched_clock thing is a separate issue, this patch
is still needed to remove the conflicting defines.

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-28 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-14 23:21 [PATCH 0/5] More omap header clean-up for the merge window after 2.6.30 Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_32KSYNCT_BASE Tony Lindgren
2009-05-28 15:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-05-28 15:54     ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2009-05-14 23:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP_PRM_REGADDR and OMAP2_PRM_BASE Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Move define of OMAP2_VA_IC_BASE to be local to entry-macro.S Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_PRCM_BASE Tony Lindgren
2009-05-14 23:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP_CM_REGADDR Tony Lindgren
2009-05-19 17:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] More omap header clean-up for the merge window after 2.6.30 Tony Lindgren
2009-05-28 15:27   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-07 20:42 [PATCH 0/5] More header clean-up Tony Lindgren
2009-05-07 20:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: Remove OMAP2_32KSYNCT_BASE Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090528155431.GC32453@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.