From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Disable kqemu by default
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:40:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090529124044.GI29375@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090529123047.GI30777@poweredge.glommer>
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:30:47AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> > Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> turns -no-kqemu option into -kqemu
> >> set kqemu_allowed to 0 by default.
> >
> > (...)
> >
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_KQEMU
> >> -DEF("no-kqemu", 0, QEMU_OPTION_no_kqemu, \
> >> - "-no-kqemu disable KQEMU kernel module usage\n")
> >> +DEF("-kqemu", 0, QEMU_OPTION_kqemu, \
> >> + "-kqemu enable KQEMU kernel module usage\n")
> >
> > Why is this change needed?
> Well, we certainly need a -kqemu option to enable it, if it is disabled by default.
>
> >
> > Even if changed, wouldn't it be better to leave the -no-kqemu option for
> > compatibility reasons? Otherwise, current scripts may break.
> options comes and go every day.
>
> but it's not a big burden, we can leave the old option around...
How about we add an option that's more future proof.
eg,
--accel qemu|kvm|kqemu|xen
if that isn't given, then it'd pick the 'best', use --accel XXX to
override the auto behaviour
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-29 12:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Disable kqemu by default Glauber Costa
2009-05-29 12:22 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-29 12:30 ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-29 12:31 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-29 13:18 ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-30 17:35 ` François Revol
2009-05-29 12:40 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2009-05-30 8:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090529124044.GI29375@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.