From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, mingo@elte.hu, norsk5@yahoo.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, mchehab@redhat.com,
aris@redhat.com, edt@aei.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] amd64_edac: misc fixes
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:01:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090529130115.a44efaee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090529103329.GB23530@aftab>
On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:33:29 +0200
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 04:47:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 May 2009 20:43:53 +0200
> > Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > > here are some minor fixlets which came up lately. I'm sending them
> > > separately as an offset from the rest of the patchset since nothing has
> > > changed there. For details, see
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git for-next
> >
> > My linux-next x86_64 allmodconfig fails to build drivers/edac/amd64_edac.o:
> >
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:3026: Error: no such instruction: `popcnt %eax,%ecx'
>
> I guess this is a rather old(er) toolchain you got there. What do
>
> as --version
> gcc --version
>
> say?
gcc-4.0.2, gas-2.16.1
Here's your sent-off-list patch (please don't do that):
diff -puN drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c~edac-build-fix drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c~edac-build-fix
+++ a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static u32 f10_determine_channel(struct
if (dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) == 0)
cs = sys_addr >> 6 & 1;
else if ((dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) >> 1) & 1) {
- temp = popcnt((u32) ((sys_addr >> 16) & 0x1F)) % 2;
+ temp = hweight_long((u32) ((sys_addr >> 16) & 0x1F)) % 2;
if (dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) & 1)
cs = (sys_addr >> 9 & 1) ^ temp;
diff -puN drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h~edac-build-fix drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h~edac-build-fix
+++ a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
@@ -443,19 +443,6 @@ enum {
#define K8_MSR_MC4STAT 0x0411
#define K8_MSR_MC4ADDR 0x0412
-/*
- * popcnt - count the set bits in a bit vector.
- * @vec - bit vector
- *
- * This instruction is supported only on F10h and later CPUs.
- */
-#define popcnt(x) \
-({ \
- typeof(x) __ret; \
- __asm__("popcnt %1, %0" : "=r" (__ret) : "r" (x)); \
- __ret; \
-})
-
/* AMD sets the first MC device at device ID 0x18. */
static inline int get_mc_node_id_from_pdev(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
_
That'll work.
A suitable way to solve all this would be to arrange for x86's hweight()
to use the popcnt instruction, where that makes sense.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-20 18:43 [PATCH 0/4] amd64_edac: misc fixes Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: msr.h: fix build error Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] amd64_edac: do not enable module by default Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] EDAC: do not enable modules " Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] amd64_edac: add MAINTAINERS entry Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 21:41 ` [PATCH 0/4] amd64_edac: misc fixes Randy Dunlap
2009-05-28 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-29 10:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-29 20:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-05-30 8:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-30 8:40 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-30 10:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-30 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-01 14:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-06-01 16:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-01 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-01 17:31 ` H.J. Lu
2009-06-01 18:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-06-01 18:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-03 18:20 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090529130115.a44efaee.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=edt@aei.ca \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.