From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755404AbZEaF4y (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2009 01:56:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752186AbZEaF4r (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2009 01:56:47 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40901 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752157AbZEaF4r (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2009 01:56:47 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 22:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090530.225646.109162435.davem@davemloft.net> To: kyle@moffetthome.net Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, yuan-bo.ye@motorola.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <1243408083.13460.14.camel@debian-nb> <20090530112221.GA1395@ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kyle Moffett Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 21:29:56 -0400 > On the other hand, since this is a new port, we can just assume that > (for this port) we're going to fix the tools to use a different path. I don't see any benefit from putting it somewhere else if existing platforms already, especially wrt. reuse of existing tools and bootup mount scripts.