From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob van der Heij <rvdheij@gmail.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] keep on ticking if oprofile is active
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:22:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090601122234.725c1e97@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vdngcr48.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:09:27 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >
> > On a NOHZ system with oprofile enabled the timer tick should not be
>
> The old style profile=... profiler should do that too.
Technically the old style profiler and NOHZ can be combined (see patch
#1 plus a fix as discussed with Thomas). On the other hand it would make
the code simpler if we just fallback to the standard tick if profile= is
used. My personal preference would be to use my patch.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-01 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-28 15:04 [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile Martin Schwidefsky
2009-05-28 15:04 ` [patch 1/2] idle profile hits with NOHZ Martin Schwidefsky
2009-05-28 20:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-29 12:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-05-29 13:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-28 15:04 ` [patch 2/2] keep on ticking if oprofile is active Martin Schwidefsky
2009-05-28 20:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-29 12:57 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-05-29 13:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-01 8:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-01 10:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-03 15:22 [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2 Martin Schwidefsky
2009-06-03 15:22 ` [patch 2/2] keep on ticking if oprofile is active Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090601122234.725c1e97@skybase \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rvdheij@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.