From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752505AbZFAVec (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:34:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751211AbZFAVeY (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:34:24 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:38370 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbZFAVeY (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:34:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:41:25 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Wu Fengguang , Nick Piggin , Andi Kleen , "riel@redhat.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "chris.mason@oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [13/16] HWPOISON: The high level memory error handler in the VM v3 Message-ID: <20090601214125.GX1065@one.firstfloor.org> References: <200905271012.668777061@firstfloor.org> <20090527201239.C2C9C1D0294@basil.firstfloor.org> <20090528082616.GG6920@wotan.suse.de> <20090528095934.GA10678@localhost> <20090528122357.GM6920@wotan.suse.de> <20090528135428.GB16528@localhost> <20090601115046.GE5018@wotan.suse.de> <20090601140553.GA1979@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Maybe we should start out, as you have, with most of the hwpoison > code located in one file (rather like with migrate.c?); but hope > to refactor things and distribute it over time. That's the plan. > > How seriously does the hwpoison work interfere with the assumptions > in other sourcefiles? If it's playing tricks liable to confuse I hope only minimally. It can come in at any time (that's the partly tricky part), but in general it tries to be very conservative and non intrusive and just calls code used elsewhere. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187385F0019 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:01:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:41:25 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] [13/16] HWPOISON: The high level memory error handler in the VM v3 Message-ID: <20090601214125.GX1065@one.firstfloor.org> References: <200905271012.668777061@firstfloor.org> <20090527201239.C2C9C1D0294@basil.firstfloor.org> <20090528082616.GG6920@wotan.suse.de> <20090528095934.GA10678@localhost> <20090528122357.GM6920@wotan.suse.de> <20090528135428.GB16528@localhost> <20090601115046.GE5018@wotan.suse.de> <20090601140553.GA1979@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Wu Fengguang , Nick Piggin , Andi Kleen , "riel@redhat.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "chris.mason@oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: > Maybe we should start out, as you have, with most of the hwpoison > code located in one file (rather like with migrate.c?); but hope > to refactor things and distribute it over time. That's the plan. > > How seriously does the hwpoison work interfere with the assumptions > in other sourcefiles? If it's playing tricks liable to confuse I hope only minimally. It can come in at any time (that's the partly tricky part), but in general it tries to be very conservative and non intrusive and just calls code used elsewhere. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org