From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Vincent Sanders <vince@simtec.co.uk>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Add ARM920T to ARM emulation
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:11:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090601231115.GC28406@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906011313.49802.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
> > I notice that ARMv4T adds the BX instruction, implying that B isn't
> > able to switch to Thumb mode although it can in later architectures (I
> > never saw the point in BX, and I guess ARM ended up the same :-)
> >
> > Is the behaviour defined to _not_ switch to Thumb when using B to an
> > address with the low order bit set, or does it trap, or is it
> > unpredictable?
>
> You need to look again at the B instruction. Hopefully then you'll realise why
> you're talking nonsense.
Ach, sorry.
My head's been buried in FDPIC, where BX is only used on ARMvT; on
everything else, LDR/LDM does the job. So I inconveniently forgot
what you cluebricked me about.
> loads into the PC either ignore(v4t) or mode switch (v5) on the low
> address bit. ALU writes to the PC always ignore the low bit in
> Thumb mode. In ARM mode the low bit is either ignored(v6) or used to
> mode switch (v7).
Thanks, it's what I've found too. from reading the 2005 ARM ARM just now.
I'll add that ARM-mode ALU writes to the PC on (v4/v4t/v5) (and loads
on v4/v4t), "bits[1:0] must be 0b00, if they are not, the results are
UNPREDICTABLE". Whereas for (v6), the bits are ignored, and as you
say for (v7) the least-significant bit is meaningful.
-- Jamie
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-01 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-29 13:23 [Qemu-devel] Add ARM920T to ARM emulation Vincent Sanders
2009-05-29 13:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Update ARM emulation to be version 4t by default Vincent Sanders
2009-05-29 21:59 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-30 10:08 ` Vincent Sanders
2009-05-29 22:05 ` [Qemu-devel] Add ARM920T to ARM emulation Paul Brook
2009-06-01 11:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-01 12:13 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-01 13:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-01 13:48 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-06-01 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-01 16:34 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-01 23:11 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090601231115.GC28406@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vince@simtec.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.