From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MBj1G-0002RO-F6 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:28:10 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBj1C-0002Mp-Pt for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:28:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBj1B-0002L0-Hu for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:28:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60162 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBj1A-0002KI-Py for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:28:04 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52861 helo=sunset.davemloft.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBj1A-0005vF-BX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:28:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunset.davemloft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B2AC8C1B4; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090602.222801.08347990.davem@davemloft.net> To: grub-devel@gnu.org, fzielcke@z-51.de From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1243977135.3400.58.camel@fz.local> References: <874ouysm05.fsf@xs4all.nl> <20090602.135427.236326423.davem@davemloft.net> <1243977135.3400.58.camel@fz.local> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Cc: Subject: Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:28:07 -0000 From: Felix Zielcke Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:12:15 +0200 > Okuji already said once [0] that he could add a new co-maintainer. > The only reply was from Robert [1] that he doestn't have time. > I wonder why I didn't reply. Well anyway I would have time but I don't > think I would be a good GNU maintainer, especially for reviewing other > patches. Ugh. Personally, I would be more than happy to see you in this role.