From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH for 2.6.30] ptrace: revert "ptrace_detach: the wrong wakeup breaks the ERESTARTxxx logic"
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:39:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090602203939.GA13939@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090602011318.GA2461@redhat.com>
Commit 95a3540da9c81a5987be810e1d9a83640a366bd5 removed the "extra"
wake_up_process() from ptrace_detach(), but as Jan pointed out this breaks
the compatibility.
I believe the changelog is right and this wake_up() is wrong in many ways.
But GDB assumes that ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child, 0, 0) always wakes up the
tracee. Despite the fact this breaks SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED/group_stop_count logic,
and despite the fact this wake_up_process() can break another assumption:
PTRACE_DETACH with SIGSTOP should leave the tracee in TASK_STOPPED case.
Because the untraced child can dequeue SIGSTOP and call do_signal_stop()
before ptrace_detach() calls wake_up_process().
Revert this change for now. We need some fixes even if we we want to keep
the current behaviour, but these fixes are not for 2.6.30.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *ch
if (child->ptrace) {
child->exit_code = data;
dead = __ptrace_detach(current, child);
+ if (!child->exit_state)
+ wake_up_process(child);
}
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090529103017.D548FFC2BD@magilla.sf.frob.com>
[not found] ` <20090529125405.GD19812@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20090529143049.GA27424@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20090530202313.GA12066@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
[not found] ` <20090530234449.GA31604@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20090601014258.E3EA2FC3C7@magilla.sf.frob.com>
[not found] ` <20090602011318.GA2461@redhat.com>
2009-06-02 20:39 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-06-02 20:55 ` [PATCH for 2.6.30] ptrace: revert "ptrace_detach: the wrong wakeup breaks the ERESTARTxxx logic" Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090602203939.GA13939@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.