All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] virtio_net: don't free buffers in xmit ring
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:13:52 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906022313.52808.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243930422.9146.60.camel@blaa>

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:43:42 pm Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 23:46 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > The virtio_net driver is complicated by the two methods of freeing old
> > xmit buffers (in addition to freeing old ones at the start of the xmit
> > path).
> >
> > The original code used a 1/10 second timer attached to xmit_free(),
> > reset on every xmit.  Before we orphaned skbs on xmit, the
> > transmitting userspace could block with a full socket until the timer
> > fired, the skb destructor was called, and they were re-woken.
>
> The timer was actually added to solve a hang when trying to unload
> nf_conntrack AFAIR - nf_conntrack was blocking on the skb being freed
> and we never actually freed it.
>
> I think skb_orphan() is enough to prevent this, is it?

Yep.

> > Unfortunately, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY makes quite a lot of work: a
> > host which is faster than the guest will fire the interrupt every xmit
> > packet (slowing the guest down further).
>
> Ouch. So, does simply disabling host support for
> VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY speed up current guests?

That was my original change.  It cuts the interrupts, but there's enough else 
going on that there's not a reliably-measurable speedup (this is with lguest, 
haven't tested with kvm).

Cheers,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-02 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29 14:16 [PATCH 3/4] virtio_net: don't free buffers in xmit ring Rusty Russell
2009-06-02  8:13 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02  8:13 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 11:41   ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 11:41   ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 14:07     ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 14:07     ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 13:43   ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-06-02 13:43   ` Rusty Russell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-29 14:16 Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906022313.52808.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=markmc@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.