From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 2/5] ASoC codec: SSM2602: assign last substream to the master when shutting down Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:59:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20090604085921.GD6983@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1243916337-29953-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1243916337-29953-2-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20090603105223.GE11507@sirena.org.uk> <8bd0f97a0906030537y1e65aa7atec4b0c5cdf4ae2f@mail.gmail.com> <20090603145316.GA7315@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <8bd0f97a0906031826j647efa0bs1ffb6492cfd0ccd8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EB41037ED for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:59:22 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0906031826j647efa0bs1ffb6492cfd0ccd8@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mike Frysinger Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Cliff Cai List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:26:34PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > it could be. i was going by the changes that werent in 2.6.30. i > thought i looked for previous submissions, but i must have missed > previous attempts. i'm not familiar with alsa stuff, so i'm not The patch hadn't previously been sent in that form but it looks like it's attempting to fix a bug which had had some previous goes at fixing it that required updates. > always sure when i need to bang on Cliff to get things fixed up > (changes split / better comments / etc...). If you're not sure there's a case for better changelogs at least! :) > if fixes miss a merge window, then that's an issue. but in general, > users only see fixes per release, so sending things more quickly there > wouldnt really help ? The issue is that things are missing merge windows - they're getting sent in but if there's any review comments a revised version of the patch isn't getting posted until the next batch of submissions. It's these revisions rather than the initial submissions that I'm concerned about.