From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 21:10:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090605201001.GA17085@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090604201649.GC13892@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:16:49PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:53:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 05:57:56PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > fix the following 'make headers_check' warning:
> >
> > I think headers_check needs fixing - there's nothing wrong with the
> > code as it presently stands except the tools obviously can't properly
> > parse C preprocessor statements.
>
> You are correct that headers_ceck is limited here and this patch
> take some valid code and refactor it to make it headers_check compatible.
If it is just a matter of unifdef not doing the right thing, then that's
a bug in unifdef - looking at the code, it _should_ handle the case as
it's currently in the tree.
I'll spend a bit looking at this issue before applying this patch - if
the fix turns out to be trivial then we all win by not requiring people
to write stuff in unexpected (to the tools, but standard C) ways.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 12:23 [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:41 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] headers_check fix: m68k, swab.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] headers_check fix: mips, ioctl.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] headers_check fix: mn10300, ptrace.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] headers_check fix: mn10300, setup.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] headers_check fix: mips, ioctl.h Ralf Baechle
2009-06-04 20:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05 9:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-05 12:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-04 20:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-08 16:33 ` Luck, Tony
2009-06-08 16:33 ` Luck, Tony
2009-06-08 17:48 ` [PATCH] ia64: unexport fpswa.h Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-08 17:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-05 9:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-04 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h Russell King
2009-06-04 15:45 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 20:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05 20:10 ` Russell King [this message]
2009-06-05 20:17 ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-06-05 20:48 ` Russell King
2009-06-05 21:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06 8:50 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 9:12 ` Russell King
2009-06-06 9:34 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604 Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05 2:00 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 8:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 8:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06 9:09 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 12:54 ` [GIT PULL] headers_check fixes Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 13:02 ` Russell King
2009-06-06 13:34 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 13:41 ` Russell King
2009-06-06 14:39 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 21:47 ` Russell King
2009-06-06 21:51 ` Russell King
2009-06-06 22:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06 23:24 ` Russell King
2009-06-07 7:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-07 7:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-07 10:15 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090605201001.GA17085@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.