From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2] b43/legacy: port to cfg80211 rfkill
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:49:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906061949.06735.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244310138.17485.11.camel@johannes.local>
On Saturday 06 June 2009 19:42:18 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 21:01 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> > > The rfkill polling routine brings the interface back to the initialized
> > > state if it is found to be uninitialized. This way the rfkill switch
> > > may be interpreted. In addition, the radio LED is not turned on in the
> > > initialization routine unless the rfkill switch is on.
> >
> > This is pretty silly behavior IMO. Just to bring it to the point:
> > We initialize a huge wireless MAC, PHY and Radio that consume several watts of power
> > just to poll a silly RF-kill bit.
>
> 1) you're MUCH overstating the power consumption
Care to measure it?
> Fine. Just don't stand in my way then.
I am not standing in your way. I'm just not going to maintain it.
In fact, I'd like to pass the whole maintainership to somebody else. But I guess there is nobody.
--
Greetings, Michael.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-06 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 18:19 [RFC V2] b43/legacy: port to cfg80211 rfkill Larry Finger
2009-06-05 19:01 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-05 21:20 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-05 21:38 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-05 22:32 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 9:34 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-06 17:38 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-05 22:38 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-06 9:38 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-06 17:38 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 17:37 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 17:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 18:00 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-07 12:55 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-06 17:42 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 17:49 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906061949.06735.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.