All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masayoshi MIZUMA <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: skip new or to-be-freed inodes
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:29:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090608092930.GA13846@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A2CB7AE.6080909@gmail.com>

Hi Artem,

On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:03:10PM +0800, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > The above race and warning didn't turn up because writeback_inodes() holds
> > the s_umount lock, so generic_forget_inode() finds MS_ACTIVE and returns
> > early. But we are not sure the UBIFS calls and future callers will guarantee
> > that. So skip I_WILL_FREE inodes for the sake of safety.
>
> The inode states are a bit vague for me, but vs. UBIFS - feel
> free to ask questions.

Thank you. Basically I'm not sure if UBIFS guarantees it won't be
unmounted (hence the MS_ACTIVE bit is on) when calling
generic_sync_sb_inodes() in shrink_liability() and ubifs_sync_fs().

Thanks,
Fengguang

PS: our previous discussions

        > > Another possibility:
        > >
        > > generic_forget_inode
        > >   inode->i_state |= I_WILL_FREE;
        > >   spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
        > >                                                 generic_sync_sb_inodes()
        > >                                                   spin_lock(&inode_lock);
        > >                                                   __iget(inode);
        > >                                                   __writeback_single_inode
        > >                                                     // see non zero i_count
        > >                                                     WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
        > >
        > > I'm wondering why didn't we saw reports on the last WARN_ON()?
        > > Did we missed something?
        >   I meant the above race in my description ;-). Anyway, the race can happen
        > only if we are unmounting the filesystem (normally, we bail out on
        > sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE check - yes, it's a bit hidden and it also took me
        > a while to understand why we weren't seeing tons of warnings...).

        Ah OK. Just checked that all three callers of generic_sync_sb_inodes():
        - writeback_inodes(): umount prevented
        - pohmelfs_kill_super(): just before umount
        - ubifs calls: too complex to be obvious..
        At least the first two cases are safe, so we didn't see the error report ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-08  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18  8:13 [PATCH][BUG] Lack of mutex_lock in drop_pagecache_sb() Masasyoshi MIZUMA
2009-03-23 10:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-24  7:06   ` Masayoshi MIZUMA
2009-03-24  7:44     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-24 12:05       ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 12:11         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-24 12:40         ` [PATCH] skip I_CLEAR state inodes Wu Fengguang
2009-03-30  7:18           ` [PATCH][RESEND for 2.6.29-rc8-mm1] " Wu Fengguang
2009-03-31 23:43             ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-01  0:53               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-01 21:38           ` [PATCH] " Eric Sandeen
2009-06-02  8:55             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-02 10:27               ` Jeff Layton
2009-06-02 11:37               ` Jan Kara
2009-06-02 21:48                 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-03 10:45                   ` Jeff Layton
2009-06-03 13:32                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-03 14:00                   ` Jan Kara
2009-06-03 14:10                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-03 14:16                   ` Jan Kara
2009-06-03 14:47                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-06  3:07                       ` [PATCH] writeback: skip new or to-be-freed inodes Wu Fengguang
2009-06-08  7:03                         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-08  7:03                           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-08  9:29                           ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-06-08 10:45                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-09  7:24                               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-09  7:24                                 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-09  7:03                             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-09  7:03                               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-08 17:07                         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090608092930.GA13846@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.