From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:20:58 +0100 (WEST) Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:38537 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20023848AbZFIMUr (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:20:47 +0100 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n59CKIAq014294; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:20:18 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n59CKHvC014292; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:20:17 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:20:17 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: MIPS: Outline udelay and fix a few issues. Message-ID: <20090609122017.GA14202@linux-mips.org> References: <20090609.111248.161838296.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090609.111248.161838296.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 23345 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:12:48AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > Relying on pure C for computation of the delay value removes the need for > > explicit. The price we pay is a slight slowdown of the computation - to > > be fixed on another day. > > Please fix this commit. Sigh. I wonder how this wrong version made it into my tree. Oh well, applied. No time to fuzz around before 2.6.30 even though I'd like to avoid the 64-bit arithmetic. Applied. Thanks! Ralf