From: "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" <mickey@vanille-media.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: progress on OE organization issues
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:11:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906101511.57613.mickey@vanille-media.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2b9ea600906092353o4fe9ea02vbc7df3b103b401c4@mail.gmail.com>
> As for the last bullet point, what is the status of membership for
> those of us without commit access? I seem to have seen mixed signals
> wether we are invited to be member of the e.V. Some messages
> indicates that only people with commit access are going to be
> accepted, while others (like mickey) request all interested in OE to
> join the e.V.
One of the major purposes of the e.V. is being able to raise funds to give
people a chance to improve the spots in OE where we are weak. The idea of a
self-chosen membership fee was to invite companies who have a certain benefit
from OE giving back in the form of tax-excemptible membership fees and
donations.
Most e.V. associations have the notion of 'active' and 'passive' members --
both which are equal stakeholders interested in supporting the association
through their contributions. I consider active members being the committers
contributing through code, docs, etc. and passive members being the ones who
rather want to contribute in monetary form.
By being a member, you have the rights to vote when it comes to decisions that
influence the future of the OE.
> Could someone put a small statement on Wiki on this?
We should, if the board agrees with that.
:M:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 12:44 progress on OE organization issues Cliff Brake
2009-04-30 14:26 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-01 1:43 ` Cliff Brake
2009-05-07 11:19 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-07 12:08 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 17:56 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-15 19:04 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 21:54 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-15 22:37 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-05-16 9:48 ` Richard Purdie
2009-05-16 10:55 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-16 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2009-05-16 12:02 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-16 12:54 ` Philip Balister
2009-06-02 21:18 ` Phil Blundell
2009-06-04 19:57 ` GNUtoo
2009-06-05 21:43 ` Cliff Brake
2009-06-06 6:46 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-06-09 9:21 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-06-09 9:53 ` Rolf Leggewie
2009-06-10 13:34 ` Cliff Brake
[not found] ` <d2b9ea600906092353o4fe9ea02vbc7df3b103b401c4@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-10 13:11 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer [this message]
2009-06-11 6:48 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-06-11 10:10 ` Phil Blundell
2009-06-11 12:35 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 19:48 ` Cliff Brake
2009-05-24 15:49 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2009-05-24 16:26 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-06 12:44 ` Cliff Brake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906101511.57613.mickey@vanille-media.de \
--to=mickey@vanille-media.de \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.